BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2005 Field searches versus vaginal implant transmitters for locating elk calves
Nathan W. Seward, David S. Maehr, Jonathan W. Gassett, John J. Cox, Jeffery L. Larkin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We compared the utility of vaginal implant transmitters (VITs) and field searches for locating elk (Cervus elaphus) calves in southeastern Kentucky during the spring of 2001. Retention of VITs among 40 adult females ranged from 1–276 days (=61.6±8.4 [SE] days). Approximately half of the transmitters (n=19) were expelled prematurely or malfunctioned. Two of 37 (5%) transmitters in translocated females performed as designed and led to calf capture. We captured more calves (n=9 in 2001; n=16 in 2002) by searching areas where elk exhibited parturition behavior. We suggest that manufacturers refine the current VIT design to increase its application and cost-effectiveness.

Nathan W. Seward, David S. Maehr, Jonathan W. Gassett, John J. Cox, and Jeffery L. Larkin "Field searches versus vaginal implant transmitters for locating elk calves," Wildlife Society Bulletin 33(2), 751-755, (1 June 2005). https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[751:FTFFSV]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
Cervus elaphus
elk
neonate
parturition
radiotelemetry
translocation
vaginal implant transmitter
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top